Search for: "Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co" Results 21 - 23 of 23
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
The United States Supreme Court, in Phillips Petroleum Co. v Shutts (472 US 797, 810-811 [1985]), succinctly addressed not only the status of an absent class action plaintiff, but also the relative detachment, and concomitant security, that characterizes that plaintiff's involvement in the litigation. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:11 am
Supreme Court authority explaining the limited involvement of absent class members in class action litigation, including the fact that “‘an absent class-action plaintiff is not required to do anything.’” Id., at *5 (quoting Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]