Search for: "Siegel v. Committee of Bar Examiners"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
At Verdict, Michael Dorf and Neil Siegel argue that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar the Court’s review of the individual mandate, but they add that, to resolve any doubt, “Congress should enact a special-purpose statute stating that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar pre-enforcement challenges to the minimum coverage provision until that provision actually goes into effect. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Siegel, Duke University School of LawReva B. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
This post includes a little more information about the Geneva Bar Association (Française). [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
And as the Supreme Court made clear 50 years ago in Brandenburg v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
