Search for: "Sierra Club v. County of Sonoma" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Sierra Club/CBD Seek Depublication of CEQA Decision Addressing Discretionary/Ministerial Project Approval Distinction
28 Jun 2017, 3:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of Sonoma (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 11 (“Sierra Club”). [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds Sonoma County Vineyard Development (VESCO) Permit was Ministerial Approval Exempt from CEQA
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Supreme Court Denies Depublication Request, Declines To Review CEQA Decision Addressing Discretionary/Ministerial Project Approval Distinction
27 Jul 2017, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
On July 26, 2017, the California Supreme Court issued its order denying the losing appellants’ (Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity) request for depublication of the opinion in Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Supreme Court Denies Depublication Request, Declines To Review CEQA Decision Addressing Discretionary/Ministerial Project Approval Distinction
27 Jul 2017, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
On July 26, 2017, the California Supreme Court issued its order denying the losing appellants’ (Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity) request for depublication of the opinion in Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Applies CEQA’s “Subsequent Review” Rules, Substantial Evidence Standard of Review; Upholds Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration and Modified Master Use Permit for Remote Buddhist Retreat
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
The Court distinguished its decision in Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CEQA Reform Begins At Home
26 Mar 2019, 9:57 pm by William W. Abbott
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 CA 4th 162;  Sierra Club v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Supreme Court Holds Stanislaus County Well Permit Decisions Under State Standards Are Neither Categorically Ministerial Nor Categorically Discretionary In Nature; Rather, Whether CEQA-Triggering Discretion Exists Must Be Determined On Case-By-Case Basis
28 Aug 2020, 12:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Yamaha Corp of America v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Holds CEQA Does Not Apply to San Luis Obispo County’s Issuance of Well Construction Permits Under Its Ministerial Governing Ordinance
30 Jul 2018, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (See, e.g., Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Substantial Evidence Test Applies to Decision Not to Require Additional EIR
5 Dec 2013, 12:44 pm by Ryan Lund
” Sierra Club v. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
Third Time Is Not The Charm: Fourth District Affirms Judgment Setting Aside San Diego County’s Climate Action Plan And Related Supplemental EIR Approvals Due To CEQA Violations
29 Jun 2020, 9:31 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (Golden Door Properties, LLC v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Supreme Court CEQA Roundup – March 2019
13 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (See, Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Eight Is Not Enough: CEQA Challenge To Eighth Addendum To San Jose International Airport Master Plan EIR Is Rejected By Sixth District, Which Holds Plan Modifications To Accommodate Projected Decreases In Air Cargo and General Aviation Are Not “New Project” Requiring Supplemental or Subsequent EIR
15 Jul 2014, 3:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of El Dorado (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1156 and Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Belatedly Publishes CEQA Opinion Upholding City of Newport Beach’s Approval of Multifamily-Housing Development Pursuant To Addendum To 2006 EIR For Larger Mixed-Use Development
8 Aug 2023, 8:28 am by Matthew C. Henderson and Arthur F. Coon
  The appellant argued that the “reverse substantial evidence” standard as set forth in Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds SWRCB Small Domestic Water Use Registration Is CEQA-Exempt Ministerial Act: “CEQA Does Not Regulate Ministerial Decisions – Full Stop.”
20 Dec 2021, 1:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Code, § 1228.6(a)(2), and Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Are Courts Actively Limiting CEQA’s Scope In The Absence of Meaningful Legislative Reform?
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The California Environmental Quality Act: 2019 Court Decisions and Legislation
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
  Applied Sierra Club v. [read post]
Lay of the Land - http://landuse.coxcastle.com/
2011 CEQA THIRD QUARTER UPDATE
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am by Abbott & Kindermann
County of Sonoma (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 949); the appropriateness of an interlocutory remedy in administrative mandamus (Voices of the Wetlands v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2017 CEQA 2nd QUARTER REVIEW
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
  Sierra Club v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Filtering The CEQA Noise: First District Upholds Santa Rosa’s Negative Declaration For “Dream Center” Youth Housing Project, Holds Non-Expert Predictions Of Significant Noise Impacts Failed To Raise “Fair Argument” Supported By Substantial Evidence
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 144, 151; Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Past Year In CEQA Case Law: A Quick Look Back at 2017
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Ministerial/Discretionary Distinction The First District helpfully elaborated on CEQA’s “functional test” for determining whether an agency’s project approval action is ministerial, rather than discretionary, in nature and therefore not subject to CEQA in Sierra Club v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com