Search for: "Simmons v. Cullen"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2023, 5:25 am
Moreover, Simmons’s claims could not have been raised in the underlying action, since the defendants were not parties in that action and were not in privity to any of the parties (see Cullen v Moschetta, 207 AD3d at 700; Mosher v Baines, 254 AD2d 467). [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:01 am
Damages at the less serious end of the Vento guidelines of £2000, plus Simmons v Castle uplift of 10% totalling £2200. [read post]