Search for: "Simmons v. South Carolina"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 8:24 am
South Carolina was filed on Monday. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:11 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Simmons v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 8:51 am
South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994), which requires states to inform juries whether a capital defendant will be eligible for release if they are not sentenced to death. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 1:42 pm
LEXIS 17355 (D SC, Feb. 11, 2016), a South Carolina federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2016 U.S. [read post]
16 May 2018, 5:00 pm
South Carolina and its progeny; and (2) whether Simmons applies in a sentencing proceeding for capital murder committed by a defendant already in prison, a context demonstrating that incarceration is not a sufficient means of preventing future violence by that defendant. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 8:15 am
"The Supreme Court has been asked to review the case of Christopher Pittman, a South Carolina boy sentenced to 30 years in prison without parole for murdering his grandparents when he was 12, reports the National Law Journal. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 7:32 am
Supreme Court in hopes of getting a South Carolina teenager's sentence reviewed. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:35 pm
South Carolina “did not apply” in Arizona. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:13 pm
South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:18 am
North Carolina and denied review in Simmons v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 10:13 am
” * * * * * * * * Social Security benefits Simmons v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:26 pm
Simmons is significant because it adopted the court's opinion in the commercial case of Brown v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Durham, NC Carolina Academic Press, 2009. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:16 pm
South Carolina, 512 U. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm
South Carolina, which held that jurors must receive such information to rebut an inference that the defendant posed a danger in the future. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 1:18 pm
South Carolina, the Supreme Court addressed this very issue. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of South Carolina: State v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:18 am
South Carolina and the Myth of Early Release David R. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Simmons v. [read post]
