Search for: "Simmons v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2007, 9:09 am
Simmons, twenty states had allowed the execution of murderers who committed their crimes before the age of 18. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
For comparison's sake, the United States Supreme Court held in Simmons that a defendant's incriminating statements in support of a motion to suppress on Fourth Amendment grounds (e.g., an admission that he owned the suitcase in which the drugs were found) weren't admissible at trial, holding that it's "intolerable that one constitutional right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm by David Tanenhaus
If the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion on integrated schools and ignored Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:18 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, and Morris v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 10:00 pm
Today there are 153 states parties; the United States is not among them.... 2005, in Roper v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:33 am by Adam Chandler
Meanwhile, both the Boston Globe and the Christian Science Monitor have stories on the Court’s denial of cert. in Simmons v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am by Hillary Byrnes
Hillary Byrnes is Assistant General Counsel for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:34 am by Amy Howe
” At Townhall, Jonathan Wood weighs in on last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Viacom Wins ‘Love & Hip Hop’ Copyright Lawsuit from DMX’s Ex Tashera Simmons https://t.co/oKM1OdTXQe -> Is Facebook starting to take music copyright seriously? [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:59 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Simmons-Harris, where Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote: The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, applied to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, prevents a State from enacting laws that have the "purpose" or "effect" of advancing or inhibiting religion. [read post]