Search for: "Simms v. Simms" Results 1 - 20 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Sarah Hiatt
NAAF  provides grants to eligible organizations for business assistance, agricultural education, technical support, and advocacy services to support Native farmers and ranchers.NAAF is a charitable trust that was created by the settlement of the landmark Keepseagle v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:51 am by Rosalind English
” (Simms v NHS Trust [2002] EWHC 2734 (Fam)) Cohen J then turned to the question of publicity. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” At EarthJustice, Patrice Simms outlines what Kavanaugh’s nomination “means for the future of environmental protections. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:43 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Diverting focus from evidence Jamal Simms, appellant, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of first-degree rape, three counts of first-degree sexual offense, third-degree sexual offense, second-degree assault, first-degree burglary, carrying a dangerous weapon openly with the intent to injure, and theft between $1,000 and ... [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 8:06 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Preservation of claim Appellant, Charles Edward Simms, was tried and convicted of first-degree murder by a jury in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County (Beckstead, J.), on March 27, 2017. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Applying Simms [1999] UKHL 33, he found that general or ambiguous statutory words are incapable of overriding fundamental rights. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 6:12 pm
Desierto, Enforcement Options and Paths to Compliance: Disputants and Global Stakeholders in Philippines v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 1:35 am by Guest Contributor
Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, 131D-G: Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 1:35 am by Guest Contributor
Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, 131D-G: Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:25 am by Hull & Hull LLP
The issue is illustrated in the recent decision of Simms v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm by Megan B. Center
District Court for the Central District of California (Court) held that a company could not do so in granting a preliminary injunction in Coachella Music Festival, LLC and Goldenvoice, LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:19 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
Simms, No. 16-1233, 2017 WL 1500308 (8th Cir. 2017) (holding same of Arkansas burglary). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:52 am by pscamp01
Harlan was 26 years old at the time and young Harlan the slaveholder was quite a different man than Harlan the author of the Plessy v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 4:51 am by Cecilia Marcela Bailliet
Zero Dark Thirty: International Law, Torture and Representation Daniel Joyce and Gabrielle Simm 29. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
  Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms ([2000] 2 AC 115) that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am by Dan Tench
  Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]