Search for: "Simms v. Simms" Results 61 - 80 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
  Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms ([2000] 2 AC 115) that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:51 am by Rosalind English
” (Simms v NHS Trust [2002] EWHC 2734 (Fam)) Cohen J then turned to the question of publicity. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:34 am by Gene Quinn
In the wake of the Supreme Court decision in Alice v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am by Dan Tench
  Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Applying Simms [1999] UKHL 33, he found that general or ambiguous statutory words are incapable of overriding fundamental rights. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Rosalind English
The appellant derived this  “necessary implication”  test from the context of human rights or the principle of legality referred to in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 and R (Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax [2002] UKHL 21, [2003] 1 AC 563, where the question was whether section 20 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 overrode legal professional privilege, a common law right deemed on a par with an… [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:04 pm
 In the only published case of which I am aware, the court in Brashear v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 1:35 am by Guest Contributor
Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, 131D-G: Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 1:35 am by Guest Contributor
Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, 131D-G: Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 9:55 am by Rosalind English
 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms [2000] AC 115, 126E-G. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 4:51 am by Cecilia Marcela Bailliet
Zero Dark Thirty: International Law, Torture and Representation Daniel Joyce and Gabrielle Simm 29. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, a nonunion job seeker was lawfully denied a referral because he refused to pay the fee charged by a union to use its exclusive hiring hall, the appeals court held, affirming the district court’s dismissal of his suit contending the fee was unlawful (Simms v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:00 am by superadmin197108
– registered for Entertainment services in the field of professional and exhibition football games – registered for entertainment services, namely, professional football games and exhibitions and more Denver Broncos ORANGE CRUSH – pending application for Education and entertainment services in the nature of professional football games and exhibitions and more – registered for ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF LIVE PERFORMANCES BY A PROFESSIONAL… [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:00 am by ipelton
– registered for Entertainment services in the field of professional and exhibition football games – registered for entertainment services, namely, professional football games and exhibitions and more Denver Broncos ORANGE CRUSH – pending application for Education and entertainment services in the nature of professional football games and exhibitions and more – registered for ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF LIVE PERFORMANCES BY A PROFESSIONAL… [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:07 pm by David G. Badertscher
Trevor Simms, Defendant-Appellant.--- N.Y.S.2d ----, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. 2010., 3455_________________________ Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. [read post]