Search for: "Simms v. Simms"
Results 81 - 100
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
§9:4831(C). [6] Simms Hardin Co., LLC v. 3901 Ridgelake Drive, L.L.C., 12-469 (La. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:09 pm
., Petitioner-Appellant, v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms ([2000] 2 AC 115) that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
Fleet St., Ltd., 148 F.3d 149, 171 (2d Cir.1998); Simms v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:34 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court decision in Alice v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:48 am
The style of the case is, Barbara Misle v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:09 pm
., Petitioner-Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Applying Simms [1999] UKHL 33, he found that general or ambiguous statutory words are incapable of overriding fundamental rights. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
Fulton v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
The appellant derived this “necessary implication” test from the context of human rights or the principle of legality referred to in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 and R (Morgan Grenfell & Co Ltd) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax [2002] UKHL 21, [2003] 1 AC 563, where the question was whether section 20 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 overrode legal professional privilege, a common law right… [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:04 pm
In the only published case of which I am aware, the court in Brashear v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 6:08 pm
Simms 08-3728 N.D. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 4:51 am
Zero Dark Thirty: International Law, Torture and Representation Daniel Joyce and Gabrielle Simm 29. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:19 am
Accordingly, a nonunion job seeker was lawfully denied a referral because he refused to pay the fee charged by a union to use its exclusive hiring hall, the appeals court held, affirming the district court’s dismissal of his suit contending the fee was unlawful (Simms v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 10:04 am
CSS and two foster parents, Sharonell Fulton and Toni Lynn Simms-Busch, went to federal court and sought a court order requiring the city to resume referrals to CSS. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:07 pm
Trevor Simms, Defendant-Appellant.--- N.Y.S.2d ----, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. 2010., 3455_________________________ Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:08 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:15 am
Simms(1988), 33 B.C.L.R. (2d) 129 (C.A.). [read post]