Search for: "Simonton v. Runyon" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The trial court had previously dismissed Zarda's Title VII claim because the Second Circuit had previously held in Simonton v Runyon (2000) that sexual orientation discrimination is not a form of sex discrimination. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:09 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Runyon, 232 F.3d 33, 36 (2d Cir. 2000) (“Simonton has alleged that he was discriminated against not because he was a man, but because of his sexual orientation. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Second Circuit Court of Appeals to again consider if discrimination based on sexual orientation is prohibited by Title VIIZarda v Altitude Express dba Skydive Long Island, USCA, Docket No. 15-3775In Simonton v Runyon, 232 F.3d 33,* the Second Circuit said that "[w]hen interpreting a statute, the role of a court is limited to discerning and adhering to legislative meaning. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:53 am by Joy Waltemath
The district court, relying on the Second Circuit’s 2000 decision in Simonton v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The district court, citing Simonton v Runyon, 232 F.3d 33, observed that Second Circuit precedent holds that Title VII does not protect against discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 6:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Runyon, 232 F.3d 33 (2d Cir. 2000), obsolete.A few weeks ago, the Second Circuit took up this issue, holding in Christianson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Like the Eleventh Circuit a few weeks ago, a three-judge panel concluded that it was stuck with its prior decision from 2000 in Simonton v. [read post]