Search for: "Simpson v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 799
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am by INFORRM
Canada An application to dismiss a claim under s. 4 of the Protection of Public Participation Act 2019 as a “strategic litigation against public participation” (“SLAPP”) suit brought by Rebel News was allowed in Simpson v Rebel News Network Ltd 2022 BCSC 1160 (CanLII). [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm by Giles Peaker
Simpson House 3 Ltd v Osserman & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER – conduct issues relied on by tenants not dealt with by FTT) (2022) UKUT 164 (LC) This was a large landlord, and where the letting agent was contractually obliged to “ensure that the Landlord complied with all relevant statutory provisions relating to the management and occupation of the property”. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
Proportionally restricting free speech rights In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J explained that, when there is a restriction on a constitutional right, the state can justify it if it meets a legitimate aim and is proportionate to that aim. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
" The catalyst for Babin's obloquy was this Court's determination, in accordance with many of our sister courts' decisions, { Simpson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
To be precise, the complainant must tender evidence of the allegations that, if believed, is “complete and sufficient to justify a verdict in the complainant’s favour in the absence of an answer from the respondent-employer”: Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd., 1985 CanLII 18 (SCC), [1985] 2 SCR 536 at para 28 (WL). [read post]