Search for: "Simpson v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 791
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
To be precise, the complainant must tender evidence of the allegations that, if believed, is “complete and sufficient to justify a verdict in the complainant’s favour in the absence of an answer from the respondent-employer”: Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd., 1985 CanLII 18 (SCC), [1985] 2 SCR 536 at para 28 (WL). [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  HLS’s Dehlia Umunna discusses Powell v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:18 am
In Schner v Simpson, (286 AD 716, 718 [1st Dept 1955]), an employee's statement "I am sorry that I knocked you down, but I think you will be able to get up" was held inadmissible on the ground that "[g]enerally speaking, employment does not carry authority to make either declarations or admissions. [read post]