Search for: "Sinclair v. Sinclair" Results 21 - 40 of 399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2023, 8:32 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include: EditorialIsrael: Cry, the Beloved Country; Vital Statistics; Book Review EditorS; In This Issue; In This Issue – Reviews EJIL Foreword Antony Anghie, Rethinking International Law: A TWAIL Retrospective Articles Anne Saab, Discourses of Fear on Climate Change in International Human Rights Law Year-Long Symposium: Re-Theorizing International Organizations Law: Reconsiderations, Hidden Gems, and New Perspectives Devika Hovell, Jan Klabbers &… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:48 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Alice Venn, Rendering International Human Rights Law Fit for Purpose on Climate Change Adaena Sinclair-Blakemore, Cyberviolence Against Women Under International Human Rights Law: Buturugă v Romania and Volodina v Russia (No 2) Judith Bueno de Mesquita, Claire Lougarre, Lisa Montel, & Sharifah Sekalala, Lodestar in the Time of Coronavirus? [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 10:46 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter * Tenth Lawsuit Against Social Media Providers for “Materially Supporting Terrorists” Fails–Sinclair v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:20 am by kblocher@hslf.org
Supreme Court is considering its ruling in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am by Michael Oykhman
An intervening act should be something “extraordinary or unusual” (see: R v Sinclair, 2009 MBCA 91 (CanLII)). [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 9:41 am by Michael Oykhman
” The case of R v Burke, 2014 ONSC 3199 held that if the accused offers to traffic a weapon, then the offer alone is enough to make out the mens rea of the offence. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:08 am by Scott Hervey
One of the cases rejecting the server test was Sinclair v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:32 am by John Jascob
The fact that Sinclair understood "reasonable best efforts" differently than Tribune and then failed in its gamble to keep the stations was fraud by hindsight, the court said, and the investors could have been winners if Sinclair's gambit had succeeded (Water Island Event-Driven Fund, LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Sinclair (C.A. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:53 am by Andy Wright
Circuit relied on in 1961 – Sinclair v, United States – had been overruled. [read post]