Search for: "Sinclair v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm by johntfloyd
What is not in doubt is that technology will surely continue to press the capability and intent behind the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:50 pm by johntfloyd
Supreme this past January 23rd in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:52 pm by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]  Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name:  Sinclair v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:20 am by johntfloyd
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals had a recent opportunity in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:37 am by johntfloyd
Confusing Logic from SCOTUS and Conflict Among Appellate Courts Leave Trial Courts Guessing The Meaning Of Confrontation By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair The Sixth Amendment is one of the most important amendments of the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 1:07 pm by johntfloyd
We feel it’s time to examine both the legislative history, and the statutory application, of crime victims’ restitution acts, both of which were discussed at some length by the Second Circuit on August 18, 2011 in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
United States, 1990 WL 124496, at *3 (9th Cir. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:22 pm by johntfloyd
United States, answered that question in the affirmative, although in a plurality decision. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 10:42 am by johntfloyd
DWI Forensic Laboratory Reports are “Testimonial” for Confrontation Clause Purposes By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair It is not often that a DWI case will find itself in the trenches of constitutional law before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWCA Civ 437 (17 June 2011): Court of Appeal: By 2-1 majority (Lord Justice Laws dissenting) Ban on tobacco sales through automatic vending machines was lawful. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:13 am by johntfloyd
Extended Border Search Doctrine: Suspicionless Searches of Computers and Cameras Need not be Conducted at Time and Place of Entry By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair It was a case of “first impression” for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals—the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
  We cannot regard that as a satisfactory situation, or think that such a result was ever intended by those who drafted the Scotland Bill 1998 or the United Kingdom Parliament which passed it. [read post]