Search for: "Sinclair v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:37 am by johntfloyd
Confusing Logic from SCOTUS and Conflict Among Appellate Courts Leave Trial Courts Guessing The Meaning Of Confrontation By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair The Sixth Amendment is one of the most important amendments of the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 1:07 pm by johntfloyd
We feel it’s time to examine both the legislative history, and the statutory application, of crime victims’ restitution acts, both of which were discussed at some length by the Second Circuit on August 18, 2011 in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
United States, 1990 WL 124496, at *3 (9th Cir. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 4:22 pm by johntfloyd
United States, answered that question in the affirmative, although in a plurality decision. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 10:42 am by johntfloyd
DWI Forensic Laboratory Reports are “Testimonial” for Confrontation Clause Purposes By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair It is not often that a DWI case will find itself in the trenches of constitutional law before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWCA Civ 437 (17 June 2011): Court of Appeal: By 2-1 majority (Lord Justice Laws dissenting) Ban on tobacco sales through automatic vending machines was lawful. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:13 am by johntfloyd
Extended Border Search Doctrine: Suspicionless Searches of Computers and Cameras Need not be Conducted at Time and Place of Entry By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair It was a case of “first impression” for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals—the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
  We cannot regard that as a satisfactory situation, or think that such a result was ever intended by those who drafted the Scotland Bill 1998 or the United Kingdom Parliament which passed it. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 11:41 am by johntfloyd
Justice Frankfurter put it in 1952 in Leland v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:28 am by sally
Supreme Court Chaytor & Ors, R v (Rev 2) [2010] UKSC 52 (01 December 2010) Spiller & Anor v Joseph & Ors [2010] UKSC 53 (01 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Mullings v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2820 (01 December 2010) Webster v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2819 (01 December 2010) SB, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2620 (27 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) International Management Group (UK) Ltd v German & Anor [2010]… [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:57 am by Meg Martin
Sinclair appealed to the State Board of Equalization, and the Board upheld the Department’s determination. [read post]