Search for: "Sinclair v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWCA Civ 437 (17 June 2011): Court of Appeal: By 2-1 majority (Lord Justice Laws dissenting) Ban on tobacco sales through automatic vending machines was lawful. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 7:24 pm by Schachtman
See “Non-publication of legal opinions in the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:21 pm
William Downey, Managing Director at W J Downey & Associates and graduate (cum laude) from the Saint Georges School of Law (1996), said, In Antigua v United States, the World Trade Organization (WTO) said the United States could restrict online gambling on sporting events, but could not prohibit offshore companies from offering online betting on horse racing. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:38 am by J
In addition, the presence of non-standard items did not mean that the authority could not currently produce a unit cost figure. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
See also United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 28.3(b) (Citation Form; Certification) (Aug. 1, 2011) (“For each legal proposition supported by citations in the argument, counsel must cite to any opposing authority if such authority is binding on this court, e.g., U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm by Jack Sharman
Almost two decades ago, I learned several lessons as a Congressional lawyer, some more useful than others. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:52 pm by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]  Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name:  Sinclair v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:44 pm by Michael Grossman
” Delivering the majority decision in Voisine v United States, Justice Elena Kagan eloquently stated: “Reckless con­duct, which requires the conscious disregard of a known risk, is not an accident: It involves a deliberate decision to endanger another. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Tommy Tobin
The three judge DeCoster appeals panel issued a three-opinion ruling, with the majority advancing a concept of responsible corporate officer liability arising from the FDCA and the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
  We cannot regard that as a satisfactory situation, or think that such a result was ever intended by those who drafted the Scotland Bill 1998 or the United Kingdom Parliament which passed it. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
Gannett, 529 So.2d 595 (1988) that explains:PLB Grain owned one of the largest, if not the largest, grain storage facilities in the United States. [read post]