Search for: "Sinks, Taylor v. State" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm by Dennis Aftergut
Voters have consistently rebelled against the Supreme Court’s June 2022 Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Both the state and local tax deduction (SALT) and the home mortgage interest deduction were capped. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 8:05 am by Marcia Coyle
Taylor complained but lived there for more than three days when he was moved to another cell, this one with no sink, toilet or bed, only a clogged drain in the floor. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:44 am by Chinmayi Sharma
He stated during his deposition that he will be resigning from his position imminently—though, he stated, due to circumstances unrelated to his presence before Congress. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Take away the Arts, Religion, Knowlege, Virtue, (all of which must flourish, or sink together) and in the Name of Goodness, what is left to us that is worth enjoying or protecting? [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/4hkpwkm (Felix Hofer) Social Media Data and the Cloud - The Omnipresent eDiscovery Challenge (Podcast) - http://tinyurl.com/4q4atpa (ACEDS) Solid-State Disk Behavior Underlying Digital Forensics - http://tinyurl.com/4mvbbfm (Robert Geselter) This Data Isn’t Dull. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
" The law could be upheld only if the state could show it served a significant local interest that could not be furthered by a non-discriminatory law--this Oklahoma could not show.Maine v Taylor (1986) is a rare example of a Supeme Court decision upholding a state statute that discriminated against out-of-state commerce. [read post]