Search for: "Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
A close reading of the opinion, in light of three later cases decided in the early 19th century, reveals that the Supreme Court intended to recognize "Indian title" while granting the United States a right of first refusal if tribes sought to sell property on the open market to non-Indians. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Jackson (Indian Reservation Diminishment)United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.htmlStanding Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:20 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2016cta.html Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, hundreds of Indian tribes that support its position, and the thousands of Indians that stand by its side in Cannonball lost an important ruling by a federal court on the Dakota Access Pipeline fight (DAPL), only to learn minutes later that the Obama administration, the defendant in Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 11:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Specifically, Appellants allege they are lineal descendants of the Mdewakanton band of the Sioux tribe who were loyal to the United States during the 1862 uprising (“loyal Mdewakanton”). [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:47 am by Mack Sperling
  The loan agreements also provided that they were "governed by the Indian Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States of America and the laws of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe. [read post]