Search for: "Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States" Results 121 - 139 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 2:39 pm by Courtney Minick
Finally, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion interpreting the “bad men” provisions in the 1868 Laramie Treaty between the Sioux Indian Tribe and the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:39 pm by Courtney Minick
Finally, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion interpreting the “bad men” provisions in the 1868 Laramie Treaty between the Sioux Indian Tribe and the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
Reply of petitioner Charles Mix County Title: Yankton Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm by Conor McEvily
DaugaardDocket: 10-1058Issue(s): Whether the Yankton Sioux Reservation includes all lands within its original boundaries other than those the Tribe ceded to the United States for sale to non-Indians in the Act of 1894.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (8th Circuit)Conditional Cross-Petition for a Writ of Certiorari [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
       In the aftermath of Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
       In the aftermath of Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield     Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield     Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
YOU SHOULD CONSULT THE FULL OPINION, AVAILABLE ON WESTLAW.]Slip Copy, 2010 WL 520564 (N.D.Iowa)United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 2:50 pm
The complaint (full text) in Oglala Lakota Delegation of the Black Hills Sioux Nation Treaty Council v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
United States, 245 F. 411 (8th Cir.1917), women 1/4 to 3/8 Chippewa were held to be Indian; in Makah Indian Tribe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 4:08 pm
The Longs are both enrolled members of the Cheyenne River Sioux Indian Tribe; petitioner is an unaffiliated South Dakota corporation. [read post]