Search for: "Skelton v. Skelton" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2021, 10:56 am by Giles Peaker
 Brent London Borough Council v Shulem B Association Ltd (2011) EWHC 1663 (Ch), (2011) 1 WLR 3014, and Skelton v DBS Homes (Kings Hill) Ltd (2017) EWCA Civ 1139, (2018) 1 WLR 362 both found the necessity of a valid demand for payment. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:09 am by Edward T. Kang
The semantic distinction between malfeasance, misfeasance, and nonfeasance and its impact on pleading standards was discussed extensively in Skelton v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:25 am
African children’s right to participate in medical decision-making processes Godfrey Dalitso Kangaude, Deevia Bhana & Ann Skelton, Childhood sexuality in Africa: A child rights perspective Alina Miamingi, The applicability of the best interests principle to children of imprisoned mothers in contemporary Africa: Between hard and soft law ArticlesObonye Jonas, Res interpretata principle: Giving domestic effect to the judgments of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights… [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
While these breaches were directly committed by Mr Skelton, the Claimants alleged that Morrisons had [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:14 am by Giles Peaker
The fact that the lessees were made aware that a charge would be made for that period, by the RTM schedule and by the 2017 demand, does not amount to compliance with section 20B (Skelton v DBS Homes (Kings Hill) Limited (2017) EWCA Civ 1139 paragraph 18: “it is not enough under section 20B that the tenant has received the information that his landlord proposes to make a demand”). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:02 am by Jani Ihalainen
To the delight of many, the Supreme Court has finally handed down its hotly anticipated decision in the Morrisons case at the beginning of April 2020.The case of WM Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants concerned the grocery store chain Morrisons in the UK, and a former employee of the company, Andrew Skelton. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:02 am by Jani Ihalainen
To the delight of many, the Supreme Court has finally handed down its hotly anticipated decision in the Morrisons case at the beginning of April 2020.The case of WM Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants concerned the grocery store chain Morrisons in the UK, and a former employee of the company, Andrew Skelton. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
They reasoned that: “In the present case, it is abundantly clear that Skelton [the employee in question] was not engaged in furthering his employer’s business when he committed the wrongdoing in question. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Frankly, My Dear, I Don’t Give a *Darn* — An Argument Against Censoring Broadcast Media, 7 Arizona State Sports & Entertainment Law Journal 153 (2017)., Alexander Lindvall, Mesa City Attorney’s Office; Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, PLC. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 7:30 am by Don Cruse
Patricia Skelton (No. 18-0386) Legal Malpractice •  Limitations Brian Erikson and Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 10:04 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On October 22, 2018, the UK Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s decision that VM Morrison Supermarkets PLC (“Morrisons”) was vicariously liable for a data breach caused by a disgruntled former employee, despite Morrisons being cleared of any wrongdoing (VM Morrison Supermarkets PLC v Various Claimants). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
In respect of the second question, Morrisons submitted that the “sufficient connection” test was not satisfied because the tortious act was not committed by Mr Skelton at work. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 3:12 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Lake v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:01 am by INFORRM
In a judgment handed down today (Various Claimants v Wm Morrisons Supermarket plc [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB))[pdf] the judge held that the defendant supermarket was vicariously liable for Mr Skelton’s data breach. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm by Robert B. Milligan
While the circuit court split continues to widen regarding the interpretation of unauthorized access under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]