Search for: "Skidmore Owings "
Results 41 - 52
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 4:25 am
Image Credits: From Flickr, Creative Commons license: Donald Trump by Gage Skidmore, Liberty Tax Man by John, Dilbert cartoon by Arpit Gupta, Scary Eyes by John Liu. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am
., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), is owed to an interpretation of language prohibiting billboards that display “flashing,” “intermittent,” or “moving” lights, contained in agreements between the Federal Highway Administration and individual states, as announced in a guidance memorandum issued by the FHWA, or whether deference, if any, is owed under Skidmore v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 8:34 am
” The Eighth Circuit found that the DOL’s position was owed deference, and rejected Applebee’s argument. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), is owed to an interpretation of language prohibiting billboards that display “flashing,” “intermittent,” or “moving” lights, contained in agreements between the Federal Highway Administration and individual states, as announced in a guidance memorandum issued by the FHWA, or whether deference, if any, is owed under Skidmore v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
There has been a project –The Great Lakes Initiative — that was undertaken with some help from Chicago architectural firm Skidmore, Owings and Merrill that is talking about the Great Lakes and St. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 8:00 am
Department of Transportation - the final component of financing for the first phase of the project; and the signing of a design contract with Skidmore Owings and Merrill, LLP. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 11:41 am
Justice Kennedy asked, "[h]ow is that consistent with the statement in Bazemore that the employer has a duty to eradicate past discrimination? [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:15 am
Moreover, given the inconsistency of the IRS’s position over time – not to mention its lack of grounding in the statute’s text – these rulings also lack the “power to persuade” under Skidmore. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Pursuant to Skidmore v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Pursuant to Skidmore v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Smiley, 16-1189 Issues: (1) Whether the Fair Labor Standards Act prohibits an employer from using compensation paid to employees for non-compensable, bona fide meal breaks that it included in their regular rate of pay as a credit against compensation owed for work time; and (2) whether an agency’s interpretation of a statute advanced for the first time in litigation is entitled to Skidmore v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
That's because, unlike any of the other defense side amici, the legal position of the government - because it's the government - has at least arguable substantive weight in its own right, depending upon whatever label (Chevron, Auer, Skidmore, etc.) the Supreme Court's inclined to apply in any particular case.We find the government's amicus brief particularly interesting this time around because the government flat out says that it's making an attempt to add some… [read post]
