Search for: "Skidmore v. Swift & Co" Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
I think the nation would be much better off if the Court were to replace the Chevron test with the test the Court announced and applied in its 1944 opinion in Skidmore v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Instagram is leaving users of its embed feature twisting in the wind (also rejecting a fair use defense on a motion to dismiss though leaving open a little room for a different result later; in the unlikely event that the Supreme Court says something about the relationship between common industry beliefs and fair use, that could bear on the outcome) Skidmore and progeny: While 2019 might have been the peak year for finding musical work infringement based on stylistic similarities—both… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am by Aurora Barnes
Swift & Co.; and (2) whether the opinion of the U.S. [read post]
The Final Rule largely tracks the NPRM, though with a number of interesting clarifications, including the following: Deleting the reference to Skidmore v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm by Erin Miller
Swift & Co., to a body of experience and informed judgment to which his colleagues may properly resort for guidance. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1944); (2) Whether the opinion of the U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1944); (2) whether the opinion of the U.S. [read post]