Search for: "Slaughter v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 2:09 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
The Court partially reversed this position when a 7-judgebench upheld a complete ban on the slaughter of bulls and bullocks in Stateof Gujarat v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:42 pm by David S. Cohen
Those Justices relied on the Slaughter-House Cases, as well as the 1876 case of United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:09 pm by Joe Whitworth
I call on the member states affected to take swift action,” he said. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 In Alliance to End Chickens as Kaporos v New York City Police Department, (App. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”Under the new rule, acceptable labels (assuming the truth of the statements) are “Born, Raised, and Slaughtered in the United States,” “Born in X, Raised and Slaughtered in the United States,” “Born and Raised in X, Slaughtered in the United States,” etc. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:26 pm by Lawrence Liang
It might seem that all is not lost when the Supreme Court proclaims in Akhil Bharat Goseva Sangh v State of AP and Ors that the decision in Mirzapur did not mean that the slaughter of cattle by itself is unconstitutional. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by David Cohen - Guest
The plurality of four refused to revisit the Slaughter-House Cases (1873) or United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
She stated that the Secretary of State did not seriously consider the most cost-effective form which such an inquiry might take or the “bigger picture” in that it was in the public interest to properly inquire about events of this magnitude and the importance of setting the record straight as well as providing truth to the relatives and survivors, Harrison v UK applied. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:25 pm
New York’s Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 63 AD3d 1419The genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State’s Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product within the meaning of Agriculture and Markets Law §200. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Its title is the Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:01 pm
New York's Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 2009 NY Slip Op 05062, Decided on June 18, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State's Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product within the meaning… [read post]