Search for: "Small v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 7,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
I was recently in a meeting with a partner at a small venture capital firm who asked, “what is the exemption for the friends and family round? [read post]
A lot of people in the United States receive their water from these really small water suppliers, some of which serve maybe just 500 people or 1,000 people. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm by jonathanturley
United States is associated with the decision where Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes coined his famous “shouting fire” analogy. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 4:58 am by SHG
Making videos of small animals being crushed by high heels may be protected First Amendment activity (really, see United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:20 pm by Brooke Miller
The project in question, a 42-unit single-family small lot subdivision, was slated for a residentially-zoned lot that contained a hillside and locally-protected trees. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
The number of indirect pools can range from as few as one or two at a small professional services firm to more than a hundred at a diversified defense contractor. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:54 am
 The entire regulatory process of the United States government is about to get upended. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
”  How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am by Beatrice Yahia
The United States has condemned Iran over the attacks in Kurdistan and Syria, calling them as “reckless and imprecise. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:15 am by Roy Wepner
Elster, No. 22-704, the United States Supreme Court has heard argument and is expected to decide in the next several months whether Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act can prevent the federal registration of TRUMP TOO SMALL as a trademark for shirts and hats. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:15 am by Roy Wepner
Elster, No. 22-704, the United States Supreme Court has heard argument and is expected to decide in the next several months whether Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act can prevent the federal registration of TRUMP TOO SMALL as a trademark for shirts and hats. [read post]