Search for: "Small v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 7,697
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2011, 7:29 pm
The November 14, 2011 ruling from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the matter Purcell v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” The Court rejected West Virginia’s argument that even if its statute favors some state law enforcement retirees, the favored class is very small. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States, or a corporation wholly owned by the Government of the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 4:43 am
The United States Supreme Court yesterday denied certiorari in Anderson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court, which began its current term last October, is considering several cases that could have significant impact on small businesses in New York and New Jersey. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner Jeffrey Lee Chafin was a citizen of the United States and a sergeant first class in the U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 5:02 am
Small earthquake in Luxembourg, few Swedes shakenCase C-316/05 Nokia Corp. v Joacim Wärdell is a gripping ruling from the European Court of Justice today from Sweden today. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  However, some in Washington are fighting to keep the United States among a small handful of nations — including North Korea and China — that allow elective abortions after 20 weeks. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:24 pm by Richard M. Re
United States, and it's a weird one. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
 She also adverted to Alice Corporation v CLS [noted on the IPKat here], to which the other speakers would later refer. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:00 am by Joel R. Brandes
The respondent was a United States citizen and would retain sole custody of B.A.S. in Italy, at least until the custody dispute was resolved in the Italian courts; she should be able to return to the United States if the Court ultimately decided in her favor. [read post]