Search for: "Small v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 7,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2006, 4:43 am
The United States Supreme Court yesterday denied certiorari in Anderson v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  However, some in Washington are fighting to keep the United States among a small handful of nations — including North Korea and China — that allow elective abortions after 20 weeks. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:24 pm by Richard M. Re
United States, and it's a weird one. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
 She also adverted to Alice Corporation v CLS [noted on the IPKat here], to which the other speakers would later refer. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:13 am by H. Scott Leviant
United States (9th Cir. 1984) 738 F.2d 1057, 1063, apply to claims for unpaid wages under California Labor Code sections 510, 1194, and 1197? [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:32 am by Ben Vernia
United States, granted attorneys fees and expenses to a small defense contractor in a dispute over a contract for electronic parts. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:46 am by Duets Guest Blogger
The United States of America is one of the easiest places to start a new venture. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
 Pursuant to the express word of the United States Supreme Court itself. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:18 am by gmlevine
That is, the Panel noted that the use or absence of punctuation did not alter the fact that a name is identical or confusingly similar to a mark, a position that is consistent with United States court decisions dealing with trademarks. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 9:19 am by Melissa E. Scott
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) reversed a TTAB decision affirming a refusal to register the phrase TRUMP TOO SMALL because it “comprises the name of [former] President Donald Trump without his consent,” striking yet another blow to the constitutionality of Section 2 of the Lanham Act. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]