Search for: "Smart v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2025, 9:01 pm
Twombly, a civil procedure case in which Souter wrote the Court’s majority opinion applying the plausibility pleading requirement to antitrust claims, and United States v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 2:03 am
Google agreed to pay nearly $1.4 billion to the state of Texas to settle allegations of violating the data privacy rights of state residents. [read post]
7 May 2025, 6:05 am
El Salvador-based Tether—the issuer of the world’s most popular and most notorious stablecoin—recently said the stablecoin legislation will allow it to issue its first stablecoin in the United States. [read post]
7 May 2025, 12:04 am
Resources: Digital Defense Fund and its 2022 EFF Award Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2025, 8:00 am
The United States’s Stance on the Right to be Forgotten Unlike the E.U. the United States does not have a federal law in place ensuring a citizen’s online privacy and right to remove their data. [read post]
2 May 2025, 2:51 pm
In that scenario, strong antitrust enforcement can support dynamic competition through the commodification of aging firms’ monopoly rents.[4] This may be the implicit, perhaps unconscious, logic underpinning the liability theories in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm
For example, the DOJ would potentially still be able to bring charges based on fact patterns similar to United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2025, 6:55 pm
The United States under both Democratic and Republic Party Presidents continued to privilege the markets driven HRDD framework. [read post]
25 Apr 2025, 7:00 am
State law is unlikely to provide a useful backstop. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 11:13 am
” United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 5:30 am
But it is enough to say here that Judge Oldham and some other very smart federal judges apparently missed a glaring defect in the papers. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 11:02 am
– 34.1 United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
”[5] The Act does not provide a minimum period to receive comments on rule proposals.[6]But, a comment period of at least 60 days has been endorsed by the Administrative Conference of the United States for significant regulatory actions.[7] Further, executive orders issued by multiple past presidents from both political parties have all recognized the importance of a minimum 60-day comment period.[8] During the past four years, a significant number of proposals had comment… [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 5:38 am
” [3] United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2025, 1:26 pm
Judge Alan Albright (W.D.Tex.) admitted testimony from EcoFactor's damages expert, David Kennedy, who derived a per-unit royalty rate from three prior EcoFactor settlement agreements to calculate a $20 million damages award against Google for infringing EcoFactor's smart thermostat patent, U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 7:44 pm
South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 9:43 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 8:16 am
A third complaint, by a Democratic member of the New York State Senate, was submitted to the state disciplinary committee that day as well. [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 11:18 am
Smart v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 4:12 am
The vast majority of systems, even if they qualify as AI systems within the meaning of Article 3(1) AI Act, will not be subject to any regulatory requirements under the AI Act. (64) The AI Act also applies to general-purpose AI models, which are regulated in Chapter V of the AI Act. [read post]
