Search for: "Smart v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm
Telecom Association v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 7:37 am
Case citation: U.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
STATE V. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:57 pm
People saddled with unbearable debts are often able to take advantage of the United States bankruptcy laws and seek relief by filing a petition for bankruptcy. [read post]
Legal Intelligencer: Circuit Split on Materiality Standard in FCA Cases and Choosing the Right Venue
15 Nov 2022, 2:02 pm
In the Second Circuit, United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:52 am
The trial court's ruling was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:31 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 8:30 am
Despite Verizon Wireless’s opposing view, the Data Roaming Order aligns the United States with the rest of the world as data roaming is seen as an impetus for growth in the mobile data services market. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:52 am
United States, 449 U.S. 383, 396-97 (1981); In re Miller, 357 N.C. 316, 336 (2003). [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
Cheney of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) gave notice that the investigation of Ericsson's complaint over Apple's alleged infringement of cellular standard-essential patents (SEPs)--with Ericsson seeking a limited exclusion order against certain Apple gadgets and Apple arguing that an import ban over SEPs gives rise to an "unclean hands" defense--has been reassigned to Administrative Law Judge Bryan F. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 10:33 pm
(a) No evidence obtained by an officer or other person in violation of any provisions of the Constitution or laws of the State of Texas, or of the Constitution or laws of the United States of America, shall be admitted in evidence against the accused on the trial of any criminal case.... [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm
§ 271(a) says: "whoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United States, or imports into the United States any patented invention during the term of the patent therefor, infringes the patent. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:24 pm
The case of State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:24 pm
The case of State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 7:17 am
Specifically, in People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:11 am
People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:21 am
As New York Times columnist Adam Liptak reported June 22, United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 11:53 am
Maryland and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 9:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]