Search for: "Smiley v. State of California" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2017, 6:47 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: Employers win flexibility in California Supreme Court ruling on “right of rest” employment law case, May 8, 2017 by Kevin Truong, San Francisco Business Times More Blog Entries: Smiley v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am by Florian Mueller
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
He acknowledged that, as a logical matter, AIRC followed from the result and rationale in the Smiley v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 8:02 pm by Florian Mueller
I hope this will be considered by the European Commission, which at least appears to be somewhat unconvinced of Samsung's SEP-related antitrust settlement proposal.On another Apple-Samsung note, Judge Koh's court in San Jose, California, stated on Wednesday that Apple's motion for a recovery of attorneys' fees and other costs, which Apple noted for a January 20, 2014 hearing, will be heard on May 1, 2014 instead. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 10:40 am by Jeremy T. Rosenblum and James Kim
As previously reported, the OCC recently adopted a final rule (the “Madden fix”) designed to resolve the legal uncertainty created by the Second Circuit’s decision in Madden v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm’n, 576 U.S. 787, 817–818 (2015); Smiley v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:28 pm by Legal Talk Network
Girardi secured a 4.85 billion dollar settlement from Merck for Vioxx, a 785 million dollar verdict from Lockheed for personal injuries, and a 1.7 billion dollar settlement from the State of California for manipulating natural gas prices. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
(For more evidence of lawyerly shabbiness in earlier stages of Moore v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:00 am by Anthony Zaller
  The bill was held in committee by the Assembly Committee on Appropriations this week, and will not likely make it out of the Committee this year. 3)     California Supreme Court addresses arbitration agreements and what makes such agreements “unconscionable” and therefore unenforceable In a consumer case, the California Supreme Court ruled in Sanchez v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Cahn, The Court’s Morality Play: The Punishment Lens, Sex, and Abortion, (Southern California Law Review, Forthcoming).From SmartCILP:Samuel A. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
” In other words, a state legislature under Article I is not independent of its state constitution, but is rather bound by it.Consider next the 1932 case of Smiley v. [read post]