Search for: "Smith and Nephew, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2012, 12:39 am
One such was Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc. [2012] EWHC 1602 (Pat). [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 9:24 pm by Patent Docs
Smith & Nephew, Inc., in which the Court held that the way the U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:03 pm by Patent Docs
By Nicole Reifman -- Last week, in Smith & Newphew, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 9:35 pm by Patent Docs
Smith & Nephew, Inc. raised issues about the appointment of Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) serving on the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), it should be remembered that it also wiped out a PTAB decision in favor of Smith & Nephew in the underlying inter partes review of Arthrex's U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am by Mandour & Associates
IPNews® - Smith & Nephew Inc. was awarded $4 million in damages on Tuesday for lost profits relating to Hologic Inc.' [read post]
29 May 2019, 1:30 pm by Cal Warriner
The SMF and Redapt stems were Smith and Nephew’s version of the dual modular stem. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:12 pm
EarthTimes reports: Smith & Nephew Inc.'s Advanced Wound Management division announced that the German Federal Patent Court in Munich has held the Wake Forest patent for negative pressure (NPWT) licensed to Kinetic Concepts, Inc. invalid in Germany. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 8:57 pm
The jury awarded Smith & Nephew $14.7 million for past infringement through 2005. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm by Nietzer
As reported by the FCPA Professor and FCPA Blog, on February 1, 2012, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) with Smith & Nephew, Inc., a medical equipment manufacturer, for violations of the FCPA.   [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:30 am
Following a remarkably swift turn-around, the Court of Appeal last Thursday handed down its judgment in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1260.Two patents were in issue: European Patent No. 0 777 504 (‘504) concerning “wound drainage equipment” and No. 0 853 950 (‘950), a divisional of ‘504, concerning “wound drainage canisters” designed to fit in said equipment. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 7:09 am by Eileen McDermott
Smith & Nephew, Inc, which made Patent Trial and Appeal Board  (PTAB) judges “inferior officers” under the U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
Once again this is a factor which undermines Smith & Nephew's favoured interpretation of the claim. [read post]