Search for: "Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 1 - 20 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 7:30 am by Kathryn Moore
Section 405(g) provides in relevant part: Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner of Social Security may allow. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Comm Social Security    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids SOCIAL SECURITY: COOK, Circuit Judge. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am by Adam Klasfeld
Others reference specific social media posts or other public records that unmask the figures hidden behind the black lines. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
” Officials have relied recently on delegations to claim the power to lead the Social Security Administration, Bureau of Land Management, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, not to mention to serve as the Deputy Director of Homeland Security. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is investigating. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The CJEU reference in Case C-362/14, Schrems v Irish Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:48 am by INFORRM
But today it came back to life, with the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Big Brother Watch and others v UK. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
  In January 2007 an Appeal Tribunal held that she was entitled to HB, but the Social Security Commissioner allowed the local authority’s appeal in June 2008. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:36 am
Smith v City of Rochester, 255 AD2d 863, however, sets out one significant exception to the general rule that eating lunch is not work. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Bloomberg reports that 400 million social media users are set to lose their anonymity in India under new rules to be published shortly. [read post]