Search for: "Smith v. American Red Cross" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm by Bexis
  Because the Red Cross was the defendant in . [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am by Emily Coward
Thomas was crossing Copley’s yard after leaving a party at Copley’s neighbor’s house when Copley shot him. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
USPTO Director David Kappos stated:  “Since the enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, we have worked in concert with our stakeholder community to launch transformative initiatives to improve the way Americans innovate, and the way the USPTO handles those innovations.  [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am by Old Fox
Nothing about the attacks against British diplomats and the Red Cross. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
American Nat’l Red Cross, 745 A.2d 316, 322 (D.C. 2000) (refusing to apply lost chance doctrine to “a claim that any provider of supplies or equipment used in medical treatment was negligent in manufacturing or processing the supplies”; “[t]o apply the loss of chance theory to cases such as these would virtually collapse the limitations that our decisions have set to the reach of proximate causation”).Florida:  Gooding v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Smith, Smith & Fawer, L.L.C., New Orleans Severance Damages in Partial Takings Cases: Lessons Learned and Future Considerations - Anthony F. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:05 am by Diane Marie Amann
Secretary-General for Children & Armed Conflict; and from nongovernmental organizations like Human Rights Watch, the International Center for Transitional Justice, the International Committee of the Red Cross, No Peace Without Justice, Protect Education in Insecurity & Conflict, Save the Children, and The Carter Center. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:20 pm by Ilya Somin
The case involves a lawsuit filed by twenty Republican "red" state governments arguing that the Obamacare individual health insurance mandate (which requires most Americans to buy government-approved health insurance) is now unconstitutional because the December 2017 tax reform law enacted by the then-GOP controlled Congress zeroed out the monetary fine imposed on violators, thereby making it impossible for the mandate to be considered a tax any longer (the theory that it… [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Smiths Medical, 165 P.3d 433, 438 (Wyo. 2007). [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
American Red Cross, 2006 WL 406353, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am by Law Lady
District Court, Southern District of Florida.Civil rights -- Americans with Disabilities Act -- Dismissal [read post]