Search for: "Smith v. Apple"
Results 1 - 20
of 407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2007, 10:42 pm
(now Apple Inc.) for infringement of its green Granny Smith apple trademark. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
One key overlap between Mr Justice Smith's approach in Optis v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:15 am
V. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:15 am
V. [read post]
18 May 2022, 11:27 am
In February 2021, it sued Apple in the Western District of Texas, alleging that several Apple products (including “iPhones, iPads, and personal computers”) infringe patents in the portfolio. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:45 am
Author Ambrosiani Licence CC BY-SA 4,0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Marcus Smith) Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others v Apple Retail UK Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 2080 (Pat) (1 July 2021)On 23 Oct 2021, I discussed Mr Justice Meade's judgment in Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others v Apple Retail UK Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 1739 (Pat) (25 June 2021). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
Having just noted that His Honour Judge Birss is stepping up from the PCC to hear the Apple v Samsung design case on Monday, this Kat was delighted to notice that the same Judge has just issued a lovely decision in a patent case, again sitting as a High Court judge. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
Ultimately, Mr Justice Marcus Smith determined that a FRAND licence to Apple for the Portfolio was a lump sum licence, with the total sum payable by Apple being US$56.43m plus interest. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am
Justice Marucs Smith. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 9:53 pm
SMITH, JR. and MICHAEL J. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:18 pm
" The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit just held its Epic Games v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 9:57 pm
On Twitter, an app developer lists a number of companies who might share some of Epic's views and concerns, but also expresses doubts any of them would throw down the gauntlet to Apple the way Epic did:Luckily Apple hasn't pissed off Microsoft, Amazon, Spotify, Valve, Google, Facebook, Netflix recently……oh. 😅It wouldn't be hard to form a coalition if everybody wasn't so scared of how Apple would react https://t.co/qrPihNcHjB—… [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm
Apple's argument for dismissal points to Judge Chen's January 2022 dismissal of Reilly v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 8:20 am
See, e.g., Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Apple FRAND ruling could be delayed by Justice Marcus Smith's new merger case (Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard) It's been almost a year since the Optis Wireless v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:29 am
As readers know, the Smith & Nephew v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am
To set the stage, Epic v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
A decision by the Quebec Superior Court to authorize a class action to go ahead against Apple Inc. may have set the bar to a new low for certification by not first sorting out whether downloading free apps deliberately breached the privacy of users.In Gad Albilia v. [read post]
