Search for: "Smith v. Barber" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2010, 7:59 pm by Anna Christensen
  To the case page for Barber v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
United States and Barber v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith: A Historical Approach, (Regent University Law Review, Vol. 32, 2020).Andrew M. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:11 am by Nelson Tebbe
Smith and school prayer, for starters. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
The homelessness cases were never going to succeed because there was CA authority in the way (Barber and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield DC [2009] EWCA Civ 285). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
The homelessness cases were never going to succeed because there was CA authority in the way (Barber and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield DC [2009] EWCA Civ 285). [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by NL
Held On gateway b challenges: Following Smith v Buckland [2008] 1 WLR 661, the challenge extended beyond Wednesbury unreasonableness. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by NL
Held On gateway b challenges: Following Smith v Buckland [2008] 1 WLR 661, the challenge extended beyond Wednesbury unreasonableness. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
We also affirm the district court's decisions on each of the defendant's six cross-appeals. 07a0291p.06 2007/08/02 Barber v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 2:42 am by INFORRM
Date Case Name Reference Court Subject Matter Posts Final win -  C or D 15.12.10 Shergill v Purewal Sir Charles Gray Libel  Summary Determination D 13.12.10 Smith v ADVFN [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) Tugendhat J Libel  Summary Determination D 3.12.10 Lait v Evening Standard (No.2) [2010] EWHC 3239 (QB) Eady J Libel  Fair Comment Summary Determination D 24.11.10 Daniels v BBC [2010] EWHC 3057 (QB) Sharp J Libel  Strike… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:05 am by Sally Peat
In the cavernous main hall, President Marianne Barber formally opened the conference and the stage was set for the opening lecture. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
The question presented is what standard the federal court should apply in considering such a claim, and in particular whether the federal court can consider evidence that was not presented to the state courts. ------- Title: Smith v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
His opinion has been the target of criticism (see ObiterJ’s post, Roger Smith’s piece for the Law Gazette and Joshua Rozenberg’s article for the Guardian). [read post]