Search for: "Smith v. Brennan"
Results 21 - 40
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2022, 2:04 pm
So I will consider the separate question of whether this law would violate the pre-Smith framework from Sherbert v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
Brennan and Marshall concluded in Furman v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
I am delighted to announce that the essays in Volume 16(1) of Emancipating the Mind: Bulletin of the Coalition for Peace & Ethics (Summer 2021) (ISSN 2689-0283 (Print); 2689-0291 (Online); ISBN 978-1-949943-06-1) are now available.This issue includes essays on Contemporary China--Heartland, Periphery, and Silk Roads. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:27 pm
S. 1, 17 (1958) (quoting Smith v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Brennan, No. 19-5885, ECF Nos. 17-18 (E.D. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 6:21 am
So will amicus briefs, including one from me and other federal courts scholars (Erwin Chemerinsky, Barry Friedman, Leah Litman, and Fred Smith). [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
Religious exemptions were thus still seen as a predominantly liberal cause; indeed, Justice Breyer, who joined the Court shortly after Smith, endorsed the old Brennan position in City of Boerne v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:11 am
See Smith. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 6:00 am
RFRA was a reaction to the 1990 case Employment Division v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 10:01 pm
Smith (1911). [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 609 (1976) (Brennan, J., concurring) ("[I]t is the hypothesis of the First Amendment that injury is inflicted on our society when we stifle the immediacy of speech. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Obama, EFF Explains Why Metadata Matters and the Third-Party Doctrine Doesn’t (EFF) NSA Spying (EFF’s landing page re NSA spying and their use of metadata) EFF cases in relation to NSA spying and metadata in order of file date: Hepting v AT&T Jewel v NSA First Unitarian v NSA Smith v Obama Win! [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Maolin case page and brief (Brennan Center) United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
" Mooppan cited Pena–Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) Smith & Nephew Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 609 (1976) (Brennan, J., concurring) ("[I]t is the hypothesis of the First Amendment that injury is inflicted on our society when we stifle the immediacy of speech. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
" Id. at 609 (Brennan, J., concurring in reversal of prior restraint). [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 2:27 pm
Smith, 426 F.3d 567, 572-73 (2d Cir. 2005) (finding that U.S. [read post]
13 May 2020, 10:42 am
Smith.) [read post]
