Search for: "Smith v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2014, 11:35 am
But San Francisco has gone the other way. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:29 am
Its supporters say the law will "make it illegal, except in the case of extreme medical emergency, to circumcise male infants and minor children" in the City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:29 am
Its supporters say the law will "make it illegal, except in the case of extreme medical emergency, to circumcise male infants and minor children" in the City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:46 am
City and County of San Francisco, No. 10-16751 (available here) After oral argument on December 6, 2010, Judges Reinhardt, Hawkins and Smith just handed down their ruling on the Prop 8 same-sex marriage trial (previous discussion available here). [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
The six votes on the topside generally consisted of the conservatives: Chief Judge Kozinski and Judges Rymer, Clifton, Ikuta, and Randy Smith, plus Judge Gould. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
(See, e.g., Board of Pilot Comrs. for the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo and Suisun v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 4:45 pm
Norberg, Defamation Lawsuit, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco (2008) [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 10:46 am
The San Francisco ordinance here -- upheld by the panel -- is meant to ensure health care for individuals in low-wage jobs. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:58 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 846, 859– 860.) [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 10-1034, which involves an Establishment Clause challenge to a resolution by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors urging Cardinal William Joseph Levada to withdraw his directive that Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of San Francisco stop placing children in need of adoption with same-sex couples. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 6:39 am
City and County of San Francisco, June 11, 2015, Smith, M., Jr.). [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
The stay means San Francisco companies with 50 or more employees must now spend a minimum amount on private or city-provided health care coverage for their workers. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
City & County of San Francisco (9th Cir. 2014). [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 10-1034, relisted after the April 22 Conference. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
Berkeley, California: A Vibrant Past I’m Ed Smith, a personal injury attorney in Berkeley. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:59 am
The second case is City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:08 am
For instance, in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, he notes that the court has recognized that the amendment’s purpose “is to safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:33 am
Given that the California Supreme Court, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:21 pm
City & County of San Francisco (9th Cir. 2014). [read post]
