Search for: "Smith v. Clapp" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2021, 12:59 pm by admin
The plaintiffs’ counsel, Cranor and Smith, and CERT failed to disclose that CERT was founded by the two witnesses, Cranor and Smith, whose exclusion was at issue.[3] Many of the lawsuit industry’s regular testifiers were signatories, and none raised any ethical qualms about the obvious conflict of interest, or the conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.[4] Cranor equates WOE to “inference to the best explanation,” which reductively strips science of its… [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:06 am by Edward Smith
  Berkeley, California: A Vibrant Past I’m Ed Smith, a personal injury attorney in Berkeley. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Kan. 2002) (acknowledging that most courts require a showing of RR > 2, but questioning their reasoning), aff’d, 356 F. 3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2004) Smith v. [read post]