Search for: "Smith v. Clinton"
Results 1 - 20
of 216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2010, 7:45 pm
The last three (Denedo, Clinton v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Smith (The Peyote Case). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:56 pm
As the No Man noted, the Supremes denied the cert petition in Smith v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 12:17 am
" Givhan contrasted Clinton's decolletage with the more abundant display by Jacqui Smith, the new British home secretary, and her complaint seemed to be that Clinton was showing too little, too unassertively.Might I suggest that sometimes a V-neck top is only a V-neck top? [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:20 am
Blount v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 6:00 am
RFRA was a reaction to the 1990 case Employment Division v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
“...EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THAT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT, PLUS THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, TOTALLY EXONERATED ME FROM THE CONTINUING WITCH HUNT BROUGHT ON BY CORRUPT JOE BIDEN, THE DOJ, DERANGED JACK SMITH, AND THEIR RADICAL LEFT, MARXIST THUGS…” --Donald Trump, June 15, 2023 The notion that presidents—and, for that matter, the rest of the federal government—must preserve their records is of recent vintage. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:47 am
Oral argument in Perry v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 10:50 pm
Smith. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:22 pm
And the six judges on the majority, who found that there was both a violation and no qualified immunity, admittedly consisted of a Carter appointee (Judge Pregerson) and three Clinton appointees (Judges Wardlaw, Fisher, and Paez), but it was the swing votes of two of the most recent Bush II appointees -- the Judges Smith -- that made the difference.Yes, draws matter. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
Title: Smith v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm
I'd wager that most of Judge Smith's current clerks were in diapers when President Clinton was re-elected. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm
Clinton, 566 U.S. ___ (2012) . [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 5:56 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 1:32 pm
Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:49 pm
Smith dissents, arguing that lands acquired in the future are included as well. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:21 am
As the Chief Justice explained in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 1:13 pm
The case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm
ALTAPURE, LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am
This blog’s Lyle Denniston and the New Orleans Times-Picayune preview tomorrow’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
