Search for: "Smith v. Commonwealth" Results 261 - 280 of 307
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Another example would be the understanding of the concept of jurisdiction which we finally resolved in Smith and Ellis (Smith & Ors v The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:42 pm by Mark Ashton
            Now it’s time to introduce Smith v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
This Client Advisory, originally distributed in December 2019, highlights important developments in the law governing employee benefit plans and executive compensation over the past year. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria rules on criminal provisions of the Trade Marks Act: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions Reference No 1 of 2008 (Freehills) Australian health club chain fights 3000% hike in music royalties (Techdirt) End in sight for IP Australia’s PatSearch system (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) Bosnia-Herzegovina Bosnia-Herzegovina signs up for Madrid Protocol (Class 46) Canada ‘Why copyright? [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 4:53 am by Al Saikali
”  So, for example, inadvertent disclosure of the fact that “John Smith’s favorite color is blue” or “the Smith household likes to watch old episodes of Breaking Bad” would allow the Smiths to sue the company that suffered the breach. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Supreme Court held more than a decade ago in Swidler & Berlin v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
The passengers (supported by the Commonwealth Attorney-General and ACCC, as interveners) took a different starting point — the threshold question is whether the forum law, as a matter of interpretation, applies to the contract irrespective of the parties’ usage of an exclusive jurisdiction clause. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:24 am by Chukwuma Okoli
  Written by Richard Mike Mlambe, Attorney and Lecturer at University of Malawi- The Polytechnic This is the third online symposium on Private International Law in Nigeria initially announced on this blog. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]