Search for: "Smith v. Commonwealth" Results 101 - 120 of 255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Another example would be the understanding of the concept of jurisdiction which we finally resolved in Smith and Ellis (Smith & Ors v The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:29 am by Irma Abella
Commonwealth, 304 S.W.3d 15, 41-42 (Ky. 2009), citing State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:25 am by Cicely Wilson
The Commonwealth estimated that Appellee sought in total the expungement of approximately 150 charges. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Smith & Nephew, 2005 WL 3470337, at *5 (M.D. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Supreme Court held more than a decade ago in Swidler & Berlin v. [read post]
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has… [read post]