Search for: "Smith v. Commonwealth" Results 161 - 180 of 264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Schulz
Wrote the Second Circuit, the PNPR, “once a political party, had abandoned hope of achieving Puerto Rican independence through legitimate political processes in favor of overthrowing American authority in that commonwealth by force of arms and by violence. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:52 am by Bexis
  First and foremost is a case we on the Reed Smith side just can’t talk about very much, since it’s our case. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am by Eric Goldman
While YouTube may have had a moral or ethical responsibility to protect its users from Defendants’ allegedly fraudulent schemes, Plaintiffs’ claim that it had a legal duty to do so is preempted by the CDA. * Smith v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am by Matrix Law
Zubaydah v Foreign and Commonwealth Office and others, heard 14th June 2023. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am by Ben Cheng
KnowlesDocket: 11-1450Issue(s): Whether, after Smith v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Immel Professor of Law, Saint Louis University School of Law    ---The Nature of the Judicial ProcessRandy Lee, Professor of Law at the Commonwealth Law School of Widener University    --Justice Cardozo's Thoughts on Judges and the LawJudge Kermit V. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
Commonwealth was an objectively unreasonable application of Graham v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog  In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as… [read post]