Search for: "Smith v. Doe" Results 341 - 360 of 6,541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  Before addressing the substance of the argument itself, it’s important to distinguish it from another, more draconian “non-self-execution” argument that no party is making but that has been prominent in some public discussions of the case—namely, that Section 3 does not apply to disqualify anyone from any office absent congressional legislation. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Nonetheless, Smith v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:27 am by Eric Goldman
Calcagni * Griper Selling Anti-Walmart Items Through CafePress Doesn’t Infringe or Dilute–Smith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Website: http://cates1980.wixsite.com/cateswebsite Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/robert.piller.3979  Jeffrey Smith GE SOIL MICROBES NEW TARGET FOR AGRICHEMICAL COMPANIES. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
” This provides a longer history to the B&B Hardware precedent as does Deposit Bank of Frankfort v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
” Complying with this demand requires that Israel takes concrete steps to let in much more aid than it does now. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am by CMS
In Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and Mullins v Smith [2018] UKSC 29, the Supreme Court held that the sole test in deciding whether someone is a worker is whether there is an obligation of personal performance. [read post]