Search for: "Smith v. Ely" Results 21 - 40 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
 In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Amy Howe
  Registration information and more details are available at ELI’s website; ELI and the law school are also making the panel discussion available via live teleconference and webcast. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 9:33 am
I agree that Eli Welch, the plaintiff Amy Smith's fiancé, was not in a "relationship to the plaintiff analogous to a spouse" and therefore is not entitled to recover under our Groves v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Smith & Nephew, 2005 WL 3470337, at *5 (M.D. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm by Henry P Yang
Darren Smyth (photo: Neil Graveney)The equivalents were a terrible idea, said Darren Smyth commenting on Actavis v Eli Lilly from the UK Supreme Court, which established that an infringed claim could be wider than the claim wording. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 1:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Normal pharma contract: Eli Lilly v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:50 am by Andrew Frisch
Oct.9, 2007) (requiring that late opt-in plaintiffs show good cause for their untimely consent filings), Robinson–Smith v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 1:34 pm
Even then, Eli Manning's success passing to Toomer, Smith, Boss, and Hixon could limit the effectiveness of this approach.Posted by Mike Dorf [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Beck, Esquire of the Erie, Pennsylvania law firm of Shapira, Hutzelman, Berlin, Ely, Smith & Walsh for forwarding this Order to my attention.Joseph v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
It is here - the Supreme Court's decision in Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48This is an important case about whether drugs manufactured by Actavis infringe a European patent of Lilly. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:46 am by Andrew Frisch
Auxilium points this Court to two opinions in the Third Circuit that came to the opposite conclusion on this question: Smith v. [read post]