Search for: "Smith v. Evening News Association" Results 41 - 60 of 1,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2014, 9:28 am by S
Associated Electrical Industries Ltd v Alstom UK [2014] EWHC 430 is the latest case to be handed down in the post Jackson/Mitchell dystopian legal world (see here, here and here for our other notes). [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:28 am by S
Associated Electrical Industries Ltd v Alstom UK [2014] EWHC 430 is the latest case to be handed down in the post Jackson/Mitchell dystopian legal world (see here, here and here for our other notes). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm by Gabriel Chin
Nevertheless, as the briefs in Smith v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:44 pm by Adam Klasfeld
Cannon found that statutes on which the Department of Justice has relied since the prior statutory scheme expired in 1999 do not authorize Smith’s appointment, even assuming he is an “inferior officer. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:52 am by Pamela Wolf
Attorneys: Steven Cooper (Reed Smith) for Hotel Association of New York City. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:42 pm by nflatow
Smith, an associate at O’Melveny and Myers, and Babak Siavoshy, a teaching fellow at UC Berkeley’s Samuelson Law, Technology and Public Policy Clinic. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 1:22 pm
Anna Nicole Smith dies after collapsing at hotel [Associated Press via New York Daily News] Marshall v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 6:00 am by Todd Hanchett
 In the first case, the Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association sued the DOL, challenging the new rule and seeking to prevent its enforcement. [read post]