Search for: "Smith v. General Investments, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
”) Smith v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:49 am
Decided in 1979, Smith set forth a five-element test for identifying securities: (1) the investment of money or money’s worth; (2) investment in a venture; (3) the expectation of some benefit to the investor as a result of the investment; (4) contribution towards the risk capital of the venture; and (5) the absence of direct control over the investment or policy decisions concerning the venture. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Lawrence]; Susan Heyes Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:04 pm
In an unusual twist, though, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:59 pm
See Harbour Properties, Inc v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
On appeal, the defendants claim that (1) the California judgment is unenforceable for lack of personal jurisdiction, (2) the contract is unenforceable under the Home Solicitation Sales Act (HSSA), General Statutes § 42-134a et seq., and (3) the amount of damages awarded by the trial court was improper. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am
Protameen Chemicals, Inc., 160 N.J. 352, 368 (1999) (“Balsamides“), and Lawson Mardon Wheaton, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 10:53 am
Grubman et al., a case brought by a group of former WorldCom, Inc. shareholders against Salomon Smith Barney & Co (Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.) and its financial analyst Jack Grubman. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:09 pm
Anschutz Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
On Wednesday 20 July 2011, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in R v Smith which was heard on 16 June 2011. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
It now befalls Mr Justice Smith and his CATribunal to ensure a legally correct outcome and to restore the general public's confidence in the UK regulatory process. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
Howmedica, Inc., 490 F.3d 1014, 1016 (8th Cir. 2007) (fragmentation of device after six years of implantation "not something that is so generally recognizable as to qualify under the so-called common knowledge exception") (applying Nebraska law); Rolon-Alvarado v. [read post]
FTC and California AG Join in Challenging Reverse Payment Settlements in the Pharmaceutical Industry
6 Mar 2009, 7:03 am
Trade Comm'n et al. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 12:47 pm
“Courts, and especially Federal courts, are becoming more and more friendly to Wall Street,” says securities attorney William Shepherd, whose investment fraud law firm, Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas, LLP represents investors nationwide. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:17 pm
There were no investments, securities, or returns or losses, and without those attributes the idea of an account is a nullity. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:31 pm
Thus the Court held, consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:48 am
See Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:40 am
Shepherd, Smith, and Edwards is committed to representing investors who have been the victims of unsuitable investments, unauthorized transactions, and other wrongful acts. [read post]
