Search for: "Smith v. Holt"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Holt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Holt v. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 10:54 am
The conventional wisdom may be that Justice Gorsuch is more likely to be a "cross-over" vote than Justice Alito, but the latter authored an important RLUIPA decision (Holt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:26 pm
Holt v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:57 am
State v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Brann of the Pennsylvania Middle District Court recently granted a Defendant's Motion to Dismiss in the slip and fall negligence case of Holt v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 5:48 am
“Out of Order” is a gift shop bauble, and its title might as well refer to how disorganized and meandering it is.Read the full review here.Abbe Smith, a law professor at Georgetown, reviews two books that "put a damper on the celebration" of the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:04 pm
App. 1993) and Holt v. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
Smith, 2016 U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:29 pm
Judge Atlas agreed with GE, citing the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Morrison v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
That question arises because a 2015 Supreme Court decision, Holt v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:09 pm
The case -- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:12 am
School Dist., 52 NY2d 625.In Holt the Court of Appeals said that letters in an employee's personnel file commenting on that employee's conduct or performance that the employer found unsatisfactory did not constitute discipline. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:54 pm
Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
We have two topics dominating today’s conversation on LXBN: the Supreme Court ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 3:11 pm
Hobby Lobby Stores (2014), and Holt v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:11 am
(Holt v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 2:18 am
Citing Holt v Board of Educ. of Webutuck Cent. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
Accordingly, “when a litigant is abusing the judicial process by harassing individuals solely out of ill will or spite, equity may enjoin such [*2]vexatious litigation” (Breytman v Pinnacle Group, 110 AD3d 754, 755; see Breytman v Schechter, 101 AD3d 783, 785; Vogelgesang v Vogelgesang, 71 AD3d at 1134; Matter of Simpson v Ptaszynska, 41 AD3d 607, 608; Duffy v Holt-Harris, 260 AD2d 595; Matter of Shreve… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98 the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double jeopardy. [read post]
