Search for: "Smith v. Holt"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
" No, according to the Court of Appeal's rulings in Holt v Board of Education, 52 NY2d 625 and in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Holt v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 5:07 am
Hobby Lobby and Holt v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Alaska 1999) (rejecting lost chance doctrine altogether).Arkansas: Holt v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:28 am
Lacey Smith, No. 96,189 (Cowley)State appeal (petition for review)Larry SchwartzWhether passenger was seized when driver detained for traffic offenseOctober 25-Thursday-p.m.State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Mercy Hosp., Inc., 283 F.3d 561 (3d Cir. 2002).Fifth Circuit: Holt v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act implements a more demanding standard (see the recent Holt v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am
In Holt v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
In Holt v Board of Education, 52 NY2d 625, the Court of Appeals decided that performance evaluations and letters of criticism placed in the employee’s personnel file were not “disciplinary penalties” and thus could be placed there without having to first hold a disciplinary proceeding. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
One answer to this, perhaps drawing on Gillett v Holt, is that a lack of clarity can be made up by the extent of the detriment undertaken by the Claimant (?). [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
One answer to this, perhaps drawing on Gillett v Holt, is that a lack of clarity can be made up by the extent of the detriment undertaken by the Claimant (?). [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
The court could also revisit or narrow Smith in Fulton v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
” No, according to the Court of Appeal's ruling in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:59 pm
Muhammad in Holt v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
O Centro, which involved a small religious group's use of the hallucinogenic drug hoasca, and Holt v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
From Gruber v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
” Rubenstein also pointed out that in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals ruled that including charges concerning an employee's performance that were previously addressed in a counseling memorandum does not constitute double jeopardy. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
O Centro, which involved a small religious group’s use of the hallucinogenic drug hoasca, and Holt v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:07 pm
The two leading cases specifying the “compelling state interest” test – Holt v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 462 (1981) (quotation and emphasis omitted). [read post]
