Search for: "Smith v. Holt"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
Holt, 144 N.C. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 5:48 am
“Out of Order” is a gift shop bauble, and its title might as well refer to how disorganized and meandering it is.Read the full review here.Abbe Smith, a law professor at Georgetown, reviews two books that "put a damper on the celebration" of the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 2:18 am
Citing Holt v Board of Educ. of Webutuck Cent. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:29 pm
Judge Atlas agreed with GE, citing the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Morrison v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
We have two topics dominating today’s conversation on LXBN: the Supreme Court ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
Smith Corporation) on March 28, 2012 discussing the need to take reasonable measures to protect information that you wish to protect as a trade secret. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:12 pm
In Roper v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
In Dugal v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
" No, according to the Court of Appeal's rulings in Holt v Board of Education, 52 NY2d 625 and in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
” No, according to the Court of Appeal's ruling in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
” Rubenstein also pointed out that in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals ruled that including charges concerning an employee's performance that were previously addressed in a counseling memorandum does not constitute double jeopardy. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
In Holt v Board of Education, 52 NY2d 625, the Court of Appeals decided that performance evaluations and letters of criticism placed in the employee’s personnel file were not “disciplinary penalties” and thus could be placed there without having to first hold a disciplinary proceeding. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
Decision 14,373Sometimes it may be difficult to determine the location of that thin line that separates lawful constructive criticism of an individual’s performance by a supervisor and supervisory actions addressing an individual’s performance that are disciplinary in nature.As the Court of Appeals indicated in Holt v Webutick Central School District, 52 NY2d 625, a counseling memorandum that is given to an employee and placed in his or her personnel file constitutes a… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:45 am
In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98 the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double jeopardy. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
Mark Smith at The Intelligent Challenge submitted his entry to BlogCarnival saying “eek, I’d never realised the UK blawg scene was so vibrant”. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:12 am
School Dist., 52 NY2d 625.In Holt the Court of Appeals said that letters in an employee's personnel file commenting on that employee's conduct or performance that the employer found unsatisfactory did not constitute discipline. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:57 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
One answer to this, perhaps drawing on Gillett v Holt, is that a lack of clarity can be made up by the extent of the detriment undertaken by the Claimant (?). [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
One answer to this, perhaps drawing on Gillett v Holt, is that a lack of clarity can be made up by the extent of the detriment undertaken by the Claimant (?). [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
October 31, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
