Search for: "Smith v. Jennings" Results 21 - 40 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2018, 7:17 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Mattis, along with the Court’s briefing orders in Smith v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm by Orin Kerr
That was a huge deal in 1986 because Congress understandably assumed after Smith v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 2:21 pm by Orin Kerr
  That was a huge deal in 1986 because Congress understandably assumed after Smith v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Smith reflected on the state of democracy and the rule of law in the Trump era. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 2:18 pm
Quarterman (No. 05-11287), and Smith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
  Accordingly, the panel reversed the district court's grant of penalty-phase relief.The petitioner raised five uncertified issues, some of which went to the validity of his conviction, and so was required to obtain a COA in order to pursue those claims under Jennings v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Smith proposed four ways in which President-elect Biden could make progress on cybersecurity on day one. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 11:39 am by Emily Dai
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit proceedings for the case Trump v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
In the Federalist Society Review, Erica Smith discusses Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
 Sineneng-Smith is one of the strangest Supreme Court cases I have read in a long time. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At Rewire, Imani Gandy discusses Jennings v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
  And the Court deep-sixed Jennings v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Diaz-Tomas regarding dismissal with leave, the Court’s grant of review in the substitute analyst case of Smith v. [read post]
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]