Search for: "Smith v. McCullough" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Notably, CMS and OIG propose to expressly exclude, or are seeking comments regarding whether to exclude, certain entities from participating in protected arrangements on the basis of historical enforcement and oversight experience: (i) pharmaceutical manufacturers; (ii) manufacturers, distributors, or suppliers of durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS); (iii) laboratories; (iv) pharmacy benefit managers; and (v) other wholesalers and distributors. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:35 pm by John Floyd
In Harris and Smith counties, more than two-thirds were under $5,000. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The Scope of JXMX Mr Justice Martin Spencer has recently refused anonymity in Zeromska-Smith v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Jolie McCullough reports on the decision for The Texas Tribune. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Nussbaum (1) Bernard-Henry Lévy (3) Bert Parks (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bessie Smith (1) Best of the Web (7) bestiality (14) Beta Rube (1) betamax3000 (18) Beth (the commenter) (9) Bette Davis (14) Bette Midler (1) Betty Friedan (8) Betty White (1) Beyonce (18) Bhutan (2) Bianca Jagger (1) Bible (40) Biddy Martin (13) biden (177) Biden gaffes (21) Biff (1) big and small (5) Big Government sounds like a creepy stalker (10) Big Hollywood (1) Big Mike (1) bigotry (22) biking (160)… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:17 pm by Brad Kuhn
"  Kudos to our colleagues Keith McCullough and Kevin Day at Alvarado Smith on the victory. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:17 pm by Brad Kuhn
Kudos to our colleagues Keith McCullough and Kevin Day at Alvarado Smith on the victory. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/27/09-10063.pdf McCullough v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
Stokes & Smith Co., 329 U.S. 637, 643 (1947). [read post]