Search for: "Smith v. Miller" Results 361 - 380 of 670
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
 The Supreme Court in Miller v Pate, 386 US 1, 6-7 (1967) stated:The prosecution deliberately misrepresented the truth. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 12:36 pm by Dan Pinnington
LAWPRO continues to see these claims, despite a court ruling (LeVan v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:23 am by Gritsforbreakfast
To me, eventually the entire third-party doctrine spawned from the court's Smith and Miller cases in the '70s (see here for an example of an Obama apologist using those cases to justify the NSA gobbling up everyone's cell-phone metadata ) must be reconsidered in light of the advent of cloud computing in the digital age, as Justice Sonia Sotomayor rightly argued in US v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Nussbaum (1) Bernard-Henry Lévy (3) Bert Parks (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bessie Smith (1) Best of the Web (7) bestiality (14) Beta Rube (1) betamax3000 (18) Beth (the commenter) (9) Bette Davis (14) Bette Midler (1) Betty Friedan (8) Betty White (1) Beyonce (18) Bhutan (2) Bianca Jagger (1) Bible (40) Biddy Martin (13) biden (177) Biden gaffes (21) Biff (1) big and small (5) Big Government sounds like a creepy stalker (10) Big Hollywood (1) Big Mike (1) bigotry (22) biking (160)… [read post]
17 May 2013, 2:00 pm by Wells Bennett
 The relevant foundational cases go back to Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally:  Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:06 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The government argued it didn't need a warrant based on cases from the 70s based on third party doctrine - US v Miller (bank records) and Smith v. [read post]