Search for: "Smith v. Municipal Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 4:37 pm
Broom-Smith, ? [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 7:14 pm
But recently the Court of Appeals in San Marco v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:20 am
In Smith v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:56 pm
Rodman DA 20-0291 2020 MT 321N Civil – Municipal Court Appeal Shepard v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
A municipality sought a similar tort-based tax in District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Many municipal civil service agencies in New York State have adopted a similar rule or regulation applicable to individuals subject to the municipal agency's jurisdiction.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's MTA decision posted on the Internet. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Many municipal civil service agencies in New York State have adopted a similar rule or regulation applicable to individuals subject to the municipal agency's jurisdiction.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's MTA decision posted on the Internet. [read post]
13 May 2010, 4:00 am
With the Smith v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:26 am
The Supreme Court of New Jersey decided the matter of State v. [read post]
25 Dec 2024, 7:56 am
Town of Montezuma v Smith, 2024 2024 WL 5180663 (4th Dept 12/20/2024) [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 6:45 am
SmithDA 19-07192021 MT 147NCriminal – Municipal Court AppealS. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:27 am
In November, the Court heard oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 7:27 pm
On October 4, the Supreme Court granted cert in Smith & Wesson Brands v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 12:45 pm
This post was authored by Julie Tappendorf and Tyler Smith of Ancel Glink and originally posted in the Municipal Minute and reposted with permission The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled against a billboard company in its First Amendment challenge to a county’s sign code. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:44 am
" Smith v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:44 am
" Smith v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Smith v County of Erie, et al., 210 AD2d 933, a probationary police officer injured during training was held eligible for General Municipal Law §207-c benefits. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Smith v County of Erie, et al., 210 AD2d 933, a probationary police officer injured during training was held eligible for General Municipal Law §207-c benefits. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 11:35 am
Other municipalities could (and have) concluded otherwise. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
On October 7, 2011 the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in Smith v. [read post]
