Search for: "Smith v. Phillips" Results 21 - 40 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2011, 6:52 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Phillips, No. 11-0148/MC, which presents these issues: I.  [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Olsen v Smith 2020 NY Slip Op 06214 [187 AD3d 675] October 29, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department is a familiar trope. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Phillips' criticizing McCauley on a Facebook page for seeking this injunction. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:40 am by WSLL
Phillips, Attorney General; John D. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Smith that "an individual's religious beliefs" do not "excuse him from compliance with an otherwise valid law. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
            As far as Phillips’ free exercise of religion claims are concerned, Colorado has no state religious freedom restoration act, and the Supreme Court held in Employment Division v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 7:21 am by emagraken
’s reasons for judgment from the hearing in which the expert’s evidence was considered:  Phillips v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:49 am by John Jascob
The circuit court disagreed, however, reasoning that the Arkansas Supreme Court had not adopted the Reves test, and that the law in Arkansas remained the test set forth by the Arkansas Court of Appeals in Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Smith Generating Station coal-fired CFB Boiler Project (Smith), Conoco Phillips and Peabody's Kentucky NewGas Synthetic Natural Gas Production plant (NewGas), and Cash Creek Generation LLC's coal-fired Cash Creek Generating Station (Cash Creek). [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which rested on "religious hostility on the part of the State itself," and specifically on "the Commission's consideration of Phillips' case," which the Court held "was neither tolerant nor respectful of Phillips' religious beliefs. [read post]